3 ms·
I agree. There's plenty of "Tester agrees"/"Tester shall (not)", but the document provides nothing of value/benefit in return. Worth noting that just because i
by stordoff 10y ago
I agree. There's plenty of "Tester agrees"/"Tester shall (not)", but the document provides nothing of value/benefit in return.
Worth noting that just because it doesn't stand up as a contract doesn't necessarily mean a claim can't be made under breach of confidence (I doubt it would be applicable here, but just pointing out that contracts aren't the only form of legal protection provided to confidential information).
- lisper 10y ago> I doubt it would be applicable here Definitely not. The bank did not disclose the vulnerability to him, he discovered it on his own. He had absolutely no obligation to the bank.