This is one of those cases where I feel the results are technically correct, but that they are likely not what the average person (if thinking of their best int

This is one of those cases where I feel the results are technically correct, but that they are likely not what the average person (if thinking of their best interests) wants. Instead of enriching culture and promoting understanding of foreign viewpoints this oppresses what is, at least in the US, the theoretical reason that such information monopolies are purportedly allowed to exist. I cannot see how banning this academic and educational work promotes the progress of science or "useful arts" (I recall this meaning roughly 'crafts-person skills').