3 ms·
Almost assuredly the 4% number is biased lower than the true population statistic (unless censoring was accounted for --- very likely not). If you don't include
by RA_Fisher 10y ago
Almost assuredly the 4% number is biased lower than the true population statistic (unless censoring was accounted for --- very likely not). If you don't include drivers having lived longer than a year the figure will be lower (same if you truncate their lifetime to be one year).
One solution would be to wait a year after the start date of all drivers as the censoring problem would go away (but of course your information is a year out of date!).
Which is it, biased lower than the true value or a year out of date?
- hackuser 10y agoHow was the number arrived at, do you know? I don't see anything about it in the CNBC article, and the article in The Information is paywalled.