> what's good for the internet is good for Google This presumes complete congruence between these two sets, which is precisely what is being criticized above.

> what's good for the internet is good for Google This presumes complete congruence between these two sets, which is precisely what is being criticized above. How exactly is: " The obvious reason for them to push their own ad blocker seems most likely; it is to suck the oxygen out of the space by exploiting their privileged position as a browser maker to destroy 3rd parties that can block their ads. " If true, good for 'the internet' in general, rather than being good for Google primarily with some related good and harm for 'the internet' ?