3 ms·
I think the main point is that if there is a standard, an implementation should comply. If there is no standard, you have to use intuition and common sense to s
by kutkloon7 9y ago
I think the main point is that if there is a standard, an implementation should comply. If there is no standard, you have to use intuition and common sense to say what's a bug.
Different people may have different expectations, so bugs become subjective.
Ideally, there is a water-tight standard. In this case every deviation from the standard is a bug and vice versa.
- mpweiher 9y ago> if there is a standard, an implementation should comply Yes. However, we are talking specifically about the parts where the standard is undefined. The standard most emphatically does not require a compiler to do these crazy optimizations that remove safety critical code.