5 ms·

It really makes me sad to read the part about counting pennies and having to stretch such tiny advances while writing the books, especially when she describes h

• Mz 9y ago
  I wish more people on HN felt this way. I often see the opposite attitude expressed here towards writers: That it is not the audience's problem whether or not the writer eats. They should pick a different job if that sort of thing matters to them. (Granted, this is typically in discussions about online content, but I think it is kind of a class divide thing. Programmers seem to often not get how fortunate and well paid they really are.)
  • averagewall 9y ago
    Guitar and video game players aren't well paid either. But they don't expect to be - they do it for fun. Isn't that fair though? Writers could do it for fun and give away their work for free. Or they could get a job doing what the market wants and not enjoy it so much but get paid more. It's very much the same situation for programmers except programmers don't have the expectation that their work must be worth money just because they spent a lot of time on it. That's life for most people - our hobbies aren't usually worth as much money as our less enjoyable jobs.
    • Mz 9y ago
      http://work.chron.com/salaries-pro-gamers-26166.html http://work.chron.com/salaries-pro-gamers-26166.html http://www.simplyhired.com/salaries-k-guitar-player-jobs.html http://www.simplyhired.com/salaries-k-guitar-player-jobs.htm...
      • averagewall 9y ago
        You know these aren't representative at all. Almost every video gamer and guitar player earns nothing for their activities. Those millions of 0's won't be included in the guitar player salary graph.
        • Mz 9y ago
          Yes, I am aware of that. But you are just confirming my original observation here. You are acting like writers have no right to earn a decent living. Just because people might enjoy their work does not mean they should starve or be required to get some other job they don't enjoy to pay the bills. I get tired of that insinuation. There are programmers who enjoy their work. They don't get told they have no right to the high salaries typical of programmers because they aren't suffering enough.
          • averagewall 9y ago
            You're talking to the wrong person. I entirely agree with J. K. Rowling's right to earn millions from her writing. Because that's what people were willing to pay her for it. How else can we decide how to take money from one person and give it to another besides the market? Who do you want to pay that money? The taxpayer? Are you wanting free income for every author, artist, game player or hobbiest so they don't have to suffer unpleasant work? That might well be a valid idea but it's quite different from what you said. How do you "earn" a living when you're supported by charity? Edit: What are you proposing instead of the current market situation? Do you want publishers to do something different? Governments? GoogFaceAzons? Readers? The general populace?
            • Mz 9y ago
              These comments usually occur in discussions about online ads. That isn't charity. Your assertion that it is charity is ridiculous.
            • deleted 9y ago
              [deleted]
    • bootload 9y ago
      "Isn't that fair though? Writers could do it for fun and give away their work for free." No. When I read this I think of Bruce Perens and BusyBox. [0] BusyBox, created by Perens as a floppy rescue/boot/installer disk for Debian, written as a single binary. [1],[2] Real handy if your partition failed or you needed to install an OS or update. This didn't stop unscrupulous companies installing BusyBox charging for it and violating the GPL licensing agreements. [3] At no time did these companies chip in to help in the development of BB. Yet they wanted (needed) the inclusion of this useful software. This is HN, a place where smart people hang out at the intersection of technology and commerce. I posted the article as an experiment to see what possible commercial possibilities could be imagined. SVG is too important to the web to let it whither and die. There must be some other way to continue this kind of work sustainably. What else can you think up? Reference [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox [1] https://busybox.net/about.html https://busybox.net/about.html [2] https://busybox.net/oldnews.html https://busybox.net/oldnews.html [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox#GPL_lawsuits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox#GPL_lawsuits
      • jdminhbg 9y ago
        This doesn't seem like a failure to dream up a way to compensate software authors, this seems like simple copyright infringement/theft.
      • greggman 9y ago
        I don't see what this has to do with the argument that "Writers could do it for fun and give away their work for free." You can argue the point 2 ways 1. Bruce Perens did BusyBox for fun and gave it away for free. After words some people were bad and got sued. So what does his making it for fun and free have to do with after words people got sued 2. Bruce Perens did Busybox and fun and gave it away not for free. His price is that if you it in a product (or portions of it, details don't matter to the point) that product (or portions of it) must also be GPLed. If you take this interpretation then we're back to the same thing, what does this story have to do with "Writers could do it for fun and give away their work for free."
        • 9y ago
    • noblethrasher 9y ago
      Well firstly, most of the best writing isn't produced by people that are having fun the whole time. Most of it is the result of authors showing up to work, day after day, whether they felt like it or not. Secondly, authors aren't the only people behind a good book. As evidenced by the typical "Acknowledgements" section, there's also the reviewers, editors, typesetters, artists, as well as long-suffering spouses and kids. But crucially, people produce their best work under some kind of coach; and coaching is not generally fun. So coaches need to be paid, which means that performers need to be paid.
      • averagewall 9y ago
        Yes, that's all true. But I'm talking about the case where authors aren't making much money compared to the effort they put in. What if the end product is so unuseful or so interchangable with thousands of similar free products that nobody wants to pay for it? In that case, I think it's wrong to ask somebody to give money to such an author. They're generating a product that costs more to produce than what it's worth. Some musicians hire expensive guitar coaches, have help from friends, hire producers to record their music and in the end they're made something that nobody wants badly enough to pay for, so it's an overall loss. I'm talking about these cases. Why should we insist that somebody pay them for their time rather than how desirable their product is?
    • the_cat_kittles 9y ago
      its simply lazy thinking to assume that people are paid what they deserve. not that your point isnt generally fair, but i always feel like we go too far in the direction of assuming people are paid what they deserve.
      • averagewall 9y ago
        Why has every response to my comment misinterpreted it? Do you all have an axe to grind against someone and you thought I was that someone? I'm simply saying that many writers produce work with very little value to other people, and that those writers shouldn't expect to be paid for their "work". Nobody pays me to eat food, even though I enjoy doing that.
        • Raphmedia 9y ago
          How is going to school, starting up a career and writing books is any different than going to school, starting up a career and writing code? Do you think that the code we write add that much value to society? Unless you are a computer scientist and pushing the boundaries, our code will simply rot away in 4 years and nobody will remember one line of it.
          • douche 9y ago
            The equivalent in writing for what most programmers do would be marketing, PR, journalism, or technical writing. You can get a paying job to write, it's just going to be that kind of writing - not for your Next Great American Novel. Likewise, I get paid a salary to bolt together shitty enterprise software and automate call-center workers out of jobs - not to tickle my fancy writing video games or exploring the corners of computer science.
            • Raphmedia 9y ago
              Aren't we talking about technical writing? The problem in the OP's post are about writing a book on SVG. I would be more likely to agree if this thread was about the issues encountered while writing a children's story book.
    • bryanrasmussen 9y ago
      What if you can't get a job doing what the market wants?
      • averagewall 9y ago
        Then you're disabled and social welfare will support you. Same as anyone else who can't get a job.
        • bryanrasmussen 9y ago
          are you by any chance not in the U.S?
    • fleetingmoments 9y ago
      What about things that are for the public good but doesn't have an immediate market demand, like government-funded research grants for scientists? The market is only concerned with short-term profits, it's not the optimal allocation of resources like some would have you believe. Projects that contribute to the commons should be funded, as long as the necessary check and balances are in place.
  • jkaunisv1 9y ago
    I went into programming because I saw how well paid a profession it would be. I could have done art or linguistics or something else. I enjoy it too, but I don't expect to be paid well for making videogames so I also do work I enjoy less that pays better. I agree with you that writers of valuable content should be compensated better, but I don't understand this attitude that one should be able to go into any job you want and expect to make a living. If you write something that people want, don't give it to them until they pay for it. Did the publisher in Amelia's case just screw her in negotiations, or do they always underpay their writers and backload it to royalties?
    • hutzlibu 9y ago
      "Did the publisher in Amelia's case just screw her in negotiations," I suppose people were just not interested in SVG so much, so not much sold books -> not much money.
• sgdesign 9y ago
  I thought this was sad as well, especially since there are many people who make a lot more than this with self-published technical books. If I'm completely honest, I hadn't heard of the author before reading her post, even though I try to keep up with the web development scene. This leads me to think that maybe she would've benefited from putting her name out there more, something many of us are hesitant to do.
  • ygra 9y ago
    I've been lurking in the www-svg mailing list for years now (originally subscribed to bring up an issue with rendering I observed). Amelia more or less suddenly appeared in the discussions a while ago, but it was definitely noticeable. Heck, it's hard to miss her name at least at the point where SVG is (was?) standardised. I do believe, however, that many, many people who use web technologies, never bothered to look up the actual specification, nor are they involved or watching the standardisation process. So it's easy to miss names that only crop up in that area.
  • spiralganglion 9y ago
    2¢ — As someone who is actively working with SVG (at the level of DOM APIs, not just using SVG icon packs), I've found her name and work to be brought up quite often. Discussions of the SVG spec generally mention her in some capacity. I've seen her cited in countless blog posts, and guest on a few podcasts. In my experience she's been as visible as anyone active in the SVG space (like, say, Sara Soueidan or Sarah Drasner).
• shriphani 9y ago
  This problem has not been fixed ever - Robert Frost - legendary American poet - worked at a bank while he was famous. So... IDK. I think people just roll with it and hope it'll all click at the end.
  • ForHackernews 9y ago
    Writers in the film and television industry fixed it, by unionizing.
    • shriphani 9y ago
      But they don't get to put their name on the cover.
• ForHackernews 9y ago
  They need to unionize. Writers in Hollywood get paid really well, because they have a union: The Screen Writers Guild.
  • jkaunisv1 9y ago
    They also get paid really well because Hollywood makes a lot of money and the national labour board ruled that most of the production companies in Hollywood HAVE to use that guild. It's not clear to me who this technical writers union would be negotiating with, or why they'd have leverage over that entity. O'Reilly obviously has a limited pool of people it can find to write a book about SVG, but that also implies those people should have leverage to command more than a $4000 advance without needing to unionize.
    • tonyedgecombe 9y ago
      I suspect many books just wouldn't get written if advances had to be higher, there isn't a huge amount of money sloshing about in technical publishing.
    • ForHackernews 9y ago
      The tech industry has a lot of money. Probably more than Hollywood, if you define "tech" broadly. Hypothetically, if all the technical book authors, how-to bloggers, and Stack Overflow contributors were to go on strike, they would have considerable leverage over various wealthy software firms.
      • jkaunisv1 9y ago
        They'd also have to somehow remove all the old how-to content from the internet and somehow find a way to stop scabs. Any up and coming developer anywhere in the world could find the basic specs and references needed to become a "strikebreaker" expert on a given topic. The nature of our industry and the widely disseminated information makes me really skeptical that could ever happen, even if there was a strong will to do so amongst developers and technical writers.
• noahjcz 9y ago
  My company (scripted.com) is looking to add more proven experts to our writer marketplace. We would be more than happy to fast-track the author of this piece through our writer application process, as she clearly has unique domain expertise. Our freelancers work all over the world, and tech writing is in very high demand. No promises but I might be able to convince our marketing department to become her first customer. Our blog could use content discussing the state of digital publishing technologies. noah@scripted.com