4 ms·
The consumers, no? They get inferior products. Who wins? Seems like its just people who want a piece of the pie, and do they deserve it? Doesn't seem like it.
by ruleabidinguser 9y ago
The consumers, no? They get inferior products. Who wins? Seems like its just people who want a piece of the pie, and do they deserve it? Doesn't seem like it.
- fdsfsafasfdas 9y agoI'd argue Facebook's purchase and integration of other products is what made them inferior.... How exactly does facebook owning instagram and facebook help the consumer? They didn't need to buy it to integrate it into feeds, and that's not how most people consumed instagram anyway. Hell, the main benefit I see to instagram is that their geotagging improved immensely.
- ruleabidinguser 9y agoHow is it worse for the consumer, though? I don't see how, under capitalism, its even possible for an abusive company to maintain a strong position.
- fdsfsafasfdas 9y ago> I don't see how, under capitalism, its even possible for an abusive company to maintain a strong position. Network effects. Together everyone hates it; individually, there is nowhere else for people to go without losing the majority of your social network. Facebook has people; its software is utterly irrelevant to why people use it.
- s73ver 9y agoThere's nothing about that action which would imply that consumers would get inferior products.