3 ms·
Definitely feasible but it's not our product focus right now. Most of the features that help differentiate Nylas Mail require some cloud component. (snoozing, s
by grinich 9y ago
Definitely feasible but it's not our product focus right now. Most of the features that help differentiate Nylas Mail require some cloud component. (snoozing, send later, reminders, open tracking, etc.)
We totally encourage folks to fork the project and take it in whatever direction they want. If you want to chat with other devs in the community, you should join our Slack room: http://slack-invite.nylas.com/ http://slack-invite.nylas.com/
(I work at Nylas)
- problems 9y ago> (snoozing, send later, reminders, open tracking, etc.) None of that has any appeal to me, I'd much rather a mail system which doesn't require using someone else's server. Maybe this isn't a priority for other people, but just putting it out there. This is what's making me not use Nylas today.
- atonse 9y agoHe's already given you a good alternative – fork and collaborate with other devs on a version that doesn't touch their server. Seems sufficient.
- hutzlibu 9y agoI would consider forking a last option, instead of "a good alternative". A good alternative in my opinion would be just to make some parts optional. Does not sound too hard, to implement (if the codebase is well done)
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]