2 ms·
This makes no sense to me. The subcontracted brands are worthless, like actually bankrupt, and nobody knows them. Why take the brand hit on "United"? I wouldn'
by logicallee 10y ago
This makes no sense to me. The subcontracted brands are worthless, like actually bankrupt, and nobody knows them. Why take the brand hit on "United"? I wouldn't call it "throwing them under the bus" to at least mention this. The amount of backlash against United and its brand is hideous.
- wyldfire 10y agoIt makes the brand look even worse if they refuse to accept responsibility for something that was ultimately their decision. It's their supplier [contractor].
- sangnoir 10y ago> Why take the brand hit on "United"? Maybe because United badly wants Republic to not go into liquidation? As to how badly - the dollar value is the difference between how much United is paying to contract versus how much they would have to pay their own Union staff.