3 ms·
> For one thing, it goes out of its way to paint fairly ordinary things (the use of regional carriers, and the fact that there are many regional carriers, and m
by 4ad 10y ago
> For one thing, it goes out of its way to paint fairly ordinary things (the use of regional carriers, and the fact that there are many regional carriers, and many of them have contracts with multiple mainline carriers) as "deceptive" (and implying that code-sharing among partner airlines is also "deceptive").
It is deceptive.
https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001804.html https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001804.html
https://hasbrouck.org/articles/alliances.html https://hasbrouck.org/articles/alliances.html
> Which says right off the bat that this is someone who doesn't know how airlines really work
Ridiculous assessment:
https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001855.html https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001855.html
https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001903.html https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001903.html
https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002099.html https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002099.html
https://hasbrouck.org/articles/index.html https://hasbrouck.org/articles/index.html
https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/cat_airfares_and_airlines.html https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/cat_airfares_and_airline...
https://hasbrouck.org/bio/ https://hasbrouck.org/bio/
https://papersplease.org/wp/hasbrouck-v-cbp/ https://papersplease.org/wp/hasbrouck-v-cbp/
- ubernostrum 10y agoThe line was: Which says right off the bat that this is someone who doesn't know how airlines really work, or who is deliberately trying to misrepresent how airlines work in order to make it seem sinister. Good job on quoting only half of it.