3 ms·
That does not change anything I wrote. > Because when there are no options left, you only have force. It actually makes it worse that you try to justify it. Y
by IIIIIIIIIIII 9y ago
That does not change anything I wrote.
> Because when there are no options left, you only have force.
It actually makes it worse that you try to justify it. You used your brainpower to find a justification for what is. But there is none. This is a non sequitur - there is no reason to use force even when people don't cooperate! Also, the vast majority of such instances require no special level of competence to deescalate, only common sense and decency, including a lot of police incidents I had to read about (I myself never had an issue with US police, even though I encountered them a lot when in my youth I crossed the US sleeping in an old car that I had bought).
The entire "deescalation" that was required in this particular case was to just let it be. What training do you need? Not even the next step of offering just a tad more money needs any special training. You make it sound as if we are talking about hostage negotiation or something requiring skills.
- SilasX 9y agoWhat are you taking about? In Germany, to this day, if the airline decides to remove you from a flight, based on reasons they deem justified, and you steadfastly refuse, they don't just shrug and say "oh well, guess we're stuck with you, let's go ahead with the flight". And once security is tasked with removing a noncompliant person, then yes, it does take training to do it without hurting them. You're right that they could have avoided needing to remove someone who didn't want to. But that's a separate issue from your blanket claim that somehow force is never justified in these situations. You're taking like no one gets forcibly removed from anywhere in Germany or police are always experts in the minutiae of contract law and instantly see through any unjustified eviction.
- IIIIIIIIIIII 9y agoThe numbers for police actions comparing Germany and the US speak a clear language. Any kind of violence is on a far lower level than in the US. We don't need to talk about the reasons - policing in the US is harder - but your argument does not work. Nor does any of it contradicts my argument, I'm tempted to call yours "whataboutism" (that doesn't even have a basis). We certainly have our own issues, and things like profiling, the same (completely innocent) people getting controlled over and over wherever they go (darker skin, wrong haircut, etc. - who knows the criteria), but none of it pertains to this issue.
- SilasX 9y agoStill not seeing how any of that substantiates your earlier claim that "no one is ever forcibly removed by police and if they needed to be, it wouldn't require training". You're just changing the topic to something more defensible.
- acqq 9y agoI don't see the claim you have put inside the quotes as being made by IIIIIIIIIIII, therefore your argument seems fake.
- SilasX 9y agoWell, I'm trying to parse it, but as best I can tell, III...'s claim is just "Americans suck at this" combined with implausible claims and explicit rejections of any plausible ones. Somehow, the mere act of evicting someone is evidence of needing to de-escalate more, as if that could somehow avoid needing to ever remove someone. Or even if you did, you could somehow do it both without training and without attacking, since everyone learns how to remove someone without hurting them sometime shortly after the crying and nursing instincts kick in? Or, if the eviction wasn't justified, all police are somehow experts on contract law to the point that they could know this? And then when called on these questionable claims, III... just retreats to, "well look at the stats" (and various other poisoning-the-well unrelated to this specific circumstance). If there's a coherent claim here, I'd appreciate the correction on what that claim is. It's easy to say "someone screwed up here", but III...'s attempt to explain what that was ends up making its own dubious claims.
- IIIIIIIIIIII 9y agoFrom your previous comment, above, that I didn't respond to: > that substantiates your earlier claim that "no one is ever forcibly removed by police and if they needed to be, it wouldn't require training". Fortunately anyone can easily see what I wrote. Your style disgusts me.
- mike-cardwell 9y ago"there is no reason to use force even when people don't cooperate" This is utter nonsense.
- Karnickel 9y agoWhich he didn't write - you did. You even put it in quotes, nice try. The discussion brings out the worst in some people here.
- mike-cardwell 9y agoAre you blind? That is completely false and the evidence is right above for everybody to see...