> As for faster, that's not always true either, since simple forward/backward scans will require two indirections, one to get the dynamic array's address and an

> As for faster, that's not always true either, since simple forward/backward scans will require two indirections, one to get the dynamic array's address and another to get the pointer to the node itself. Can this be stored in a register when you're accessing multiple locations in the array in sequence?