Net neutrality is a good thing. Free access to information is a good thing. In rare cases, these two objectives collide. Making a website free of charge would

Net neutrality is a good thing. Free access to information is a good thing. In rare cases, these two objectives collide. Making a website free of charge would amount it to public infrastructure. I would understand it for governmental websites, but I feel it is a bit weird for foreign non-profits and would be even weirder for specific companies. I think the slippery slope argument is good enough in that case. First Wikipedia will argue that it is an essential service, then Google, Facebook and Twitter will do the same and they can provide good arguments for that.