4 ms·

The wire.in is a dangerous website which consistently promotes companies and policies from other countries without understanding the nuance of the subcontinent.

The wire.in is a dangerous website which consistently promotes companies and policies from other countries without understanding the nuance of the subcontinent. It is high time, media magazines write down detailed information about the executives of such organization, how they (capital fund and revenue source of the organization) make money and why their articles will have a bias or not.

baq 9y ago
if you are a human, you are biased full stop. why you consider a news site dangerous is beyond me. consider this: in the west, saying that a news site is dangerous is dangerous.
- JumpCrisscross 9y ago
  > why you consider a news site dangerous is beyond me I consider Zero Hedge a "dangerous" website. That doesn't mean "dangerous" as in a physical or financial threat. It means "dangerous" as in after I read anything there, I expect to be--on average--less informed than when I entered.
- johansch 9y ago
  In this part of Asia, "dangerous" is code for "troublemaker", i.e. anyone who tries to challenge the state-sanctioned message. I think it's a sino-ism.
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
- sasaram 9y ago
  Thanks for explaining me there ! Do note I have focused on the news organization and not the article. This article is fine as a standalone. However, there is this eery consistency in the stand wire.in takes, on discussions. This I find dangerous for a press organization. Since it is not a news organization but a propaganda organization. When I think of a news organization, I expect good investigative journalism, many details which makes the reader informed to take decisions. This technically means wire.in is a lie for a news organization. I do like the comparison with zerohedge. There are many similarities, except zero hedge being bearish, grim and hateful is not hidden in its marketing.
- ShirsenduK 9y ago
  I can confirm with proof that they spread incorrect information and will not fix it even if you bring it to their notice. i.e. Fake News propagator.
johansch 9y ago
"dangerous website" "promotes companies and policies from other countries" Wow. Well... welcome to the internet?
flak48 9y ago
Bhakt detected

baq 9y ago

if you are a human, you are biased full stop. why you consider a news site dangerous is beyond me. consider this: in the west, saying that a news site is dangerous is dangerous.

JumpCrisscross 9y ago
> why you consider a news site dangerous is beyond me I consider Zero Hedge a "dangerous" website. That doesn't mean "dangerous" as in a physical or financial threat. It means "dangerous" as in after I read anything there, I expect to be--on average--less informed than when I entered.
johansch 9y ago
In this part of Asia, "dangerous" is code for "troublemaker", i.e. anyone who tries to challenge the state-sanctioned message. I think it's a sino-ism.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
sasaram 9y ago
Thanks for explaining me there ! Do note I have focused on the news organization and not the article. This article is fine as a standalone. However, there is this eery consistency in the stand wire.in takes, on discussions. This I find dangerous for a press organization. Since it is not a news organization but a propaganda organization. When I think of a news organization, I expect good investigative journalism, many details which makes the reader informed to take decisions. This technically means wire.in is a lie for a news organization. I do like the comparison with zerohedge. There are many similarities, except zero hedge being bearish, grim and hateful is not hidden in its marketing.
ShirsenduK 9y ago
I can confirm with proof that they spread incorrect information and will not fix it even if you bring it to their notice. i.e. Fake News propagator.

johansch 9y ago

"dangerous website" "promotes companies and policies from other countries" Wow. Well... welcome to the internet?

flak48 9y ago

Bhakt detected