> I was saying that talking to someone on the phone is the worst customer service experience in common use. I disagree with that pretty strongly. The phone is

> I was saying that talking to someone on the phone is the worst customer service experience in common use. I disagree with that pretty strongly. The phone is the second-best method for communicating a complex or unusual problem, only behind a face-to-face meeting. Anyway, the worst customer service experience in common use is actually the fixed-option support menu (that usually obscures how to contact a real person). The real determiner of good customer service is how the process was designed and how empowered the representatives are to fix your problem. Case in point: Amazon's famous customer service. I had an unusual problem with an order recently. Their chat support utterly failed to help me after several tries, leaving me very frustrated. Their email support couldn't help me either, but explained I needed to call. It turns out only their phone support is empowered to escalate things to someone who could help, plus the it was much easier to relate my issue to them. None of that frustration had anything to do with the phone vs. chat vs. email, but everything to do with Amazon's (poor) support choices. > My anger is over the fact that I've been given​ no option but a phone call. I can understand feeling frustration at that, but not anger.