> If this helps to reduce the incidence of food poisoning, I'm all for it. I can think of no reason it would? Why? Street vendors obviously use food from the

> If this helps to reduce the incidence of food poisoning, I'm all for it. I can think of no reason it would? Why? Street vendors obviously use food from the markets quickly and should learn from their mistakes on a smaller percent of people. Forcing people to eat at home means they'll have food bought from the same markets sitting around for longer, less equipment and without any experience on unusual occurrences. And I'm not sure why educated adults should be denied the amazing experience of street food in any case. Plus I'd be guessing the child got that from a restaurant, assuming they are tourists this is where most get sick from in my experience (generally I find the less adventurous are the ones who tend to get sick)