3 ms·
The part where people are treated differently based on their personal procreation/relationship choices? While not strictly classist, it's at very least discrimi
by freeflight 10y ago
The part where people are treated differently based on their personal procreation/relationship choices? While not strictly classist, it's at very least discriminatory.
Some people just don't want to produce offspring or commit to a traditional marriage for a number of different reasons, some of these even include focusing on work/business. Why should these people "earn" less than people who went with the cookie cutter nuclear family approach?
- Falling3 10y agoDiscriminatory sure. I'm not arguing it's right, but I'm just not seeing anything classist about it.
- ianai 10y agoIt's classist in that it denies the person seeking what the other person has the opportunity to progress. I would personally benefit from those hours in ways that include family forming. I'm not a member of the "family man" class and I'm being denied the opportunity to join it. My current work situation puts me in a very disadvantaged position for family forming. You, of course, have to take my word on much of this.