2 ms·
From the article it sounds like they're basing these tests off probably their dev machines. Seems like they should be trying this out on slower machines.
by foota 10y ago
From the article it sounds like they're basing these tests off probably their dev machines. Seems like they should be trying this out on slower machines.
- Klathmon 10y agoIt sounds to me like they are testing it on slower machines (specifically slower hard drives), as they specifically call out one of the "smaller" optimizations as having a significant impact on machines with slower hard drives.
- foota 10y agoIt sounded to me like they were extrapolating though, "This resulted in a ~100ms improvement on a fast machine with an SSD but, since most of this work was I/O bound, we expect it to be even more noticeable on slower hardware." This in fact was where I drew the inspiration for my comment from.