3 ms·
The 480 was 14nm as well. It's literally the exact same thing, same process. New default clock/voltage, new model number. The process did improve over time, sur
by floatboth 9y ago
The 480 was 14nm as well. It's literally the exact same thing, same process. New default clock/voltage, new model number. The process did improve over time, sure, but a late 480 is pretty much the same as a 580.
- sp332 9y agoOh, I misread. They said it's an improved process, but I guess it's at the same node as the last one.
- npunt 9y agoA process can be drastically better while being on the same node - e.g adding FinFet or other technologies. Meanwhile everyone uses different measures of node size such that they're not comparable across fabs and are kind of marketing numbers these days.