3 ms·
Backblaze is doing to S3 what I dream about doing to Amazon Retail after several years working for them. The amazon philosophy is quite a bit like the underpan
by saosebastiao 10y ago
Backblaze is doing to S3 what I dream about doing to Amazon Retail after several years working for them.
The amazon philosophy is quite a bit like the underpants gnomes: 1) grow, 2) ..., 3) profit. Where there are natural monopolies with obvious economies of scale, this is an incredible strategy. But outside of that (retail, for example), it just doesn't work. Economies of scale come coupled with diseconomies of scale, and #2 needs to be an intentional and deliberate approach to managing those diseconomies of scale. If you look at their financials, it is obvious that Amazon retail has had a miserable time managing this...over the last 15 years they have steadily lower inventory turns, steadily increasing logistics costs, availability inconsistency, etc. Anybody who works there now or worked there in the past can see how inefficiently they run things and how efficiency improvements one day are ameliorated by political and speculative decisions the next day.
Combine this with their typical acquisition strategy, as exemplified by the Quidsi approach. Lowball, and when they don't accept, spend money subsidizing your own product to undercut their market and make them more desperate to sell.
The Backblaze approach is genius for taking on Amazon because it inverts the priorities to 1) meticulously manage costs, and then 2) directly engage amazon by competing on price. Backblaze can compete on price because their cost structure is lower than Amazon. Amazon can always subsidize their product, but by doing so Amazon is in the weaker position in the endurance race. Backblaze can ride out the attempts at undercutting them because they have a lower cost structure and prices need to drop a lot before they affect their cash flow safety. It's also a resilient strategy; Amazon can know that's exactly what they're doing and they can't do anything to stop it apart from beating them at their own game of cost management. It's a slow and steady road, but it can work.
Now, if only they would start running more than an S3 competitor :)
- discodave 10y ago> Now, if only they would start running more than an S3 competitor But then Backblaze don't have the cost advantage! Amazon uses their profits from S3/EC2 to subsidise all the new AWS services (and feature development for the existing services).
- budmang 10y agoI don't know much about Amazon's retail business, but you're spot-on about us focusing on meticulously managing costs. Sometimes people ask how we do it and the hardest part to explain is that the culture of the company is built around that.
- dastbe 10y agoSo I would argue that #2 is in fact "drive efficiency", except that its also never 1 then 2 then 3. You can drive growth early on to gain traction, then drive efficiency to improve margins and make new features more tractable, which drives more growth which further drives more efficiency investment etc. etc. Some things don't have to work on efficiency for a long (years) period of time because growth is just that much more important now, even if it means more work later to make things efficient. Some things just drive efficiency from the very beginning because they just have to be efficient to be worthwhile. Most things straddle the two.