3 ms·
Its hard to be highly available, redundant, and cheap. AWS picked the first two. B2 picked the second two. I don't think they would make a great CDN host.
by brianwawok 10y ago
Its hard to be highly available, redundant, and cheap.
AWS picked the first two. B2 picked the second two. I don't think they would make a great CDN host.
- brianwski 10y agoBrian from Backblaze here. > AWS picked highly available, redundant > Backblaze picked redundant, and cheap Both AWS and Backblaze have had (and will have more) outages. No single vendor is a good choice for a service that absolutely positively must stay up no matter what. We liked this article that shows how to configure Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure, or Backblaze B2 so you are not susceptible to Amazon outages: https://cloudrail.com/avoid-next-aws-s3-outage-failover-scenario/ https://cloudrail.com/avoid-next-aws-s3-outage-failover-scen...