To me, this article seemed more about how political barbecue can be. It's equivocal about what the children should do, and never really answers the question of

To me, this article seemed more about how political barbecue can be. It's equivocal about what the children should do, and never really answers the question of whether it's okay to eat at the restaurant again. You might think that it's obvious that the children have no obligation whatsoever, but that doesn't make contrary opinions political persecution, even in vibe.