2 ms·
Thanks for the encouraging words! I don't have any future plans yet, depends on the feedback I get and if there's enough interest for further features. I think
by folli 10y ago
Thanks for the encouraging words! I don't have any future plans yet, depends on the feedback I get and if there's enough interest for further features.
I think you're touching a valid point, but it goes even further. There are many different use cases for a bio-software; a bench-worker has different requirements than a geneticist, microbiologists vs cell biologists etc, WGS and RNA-seq need an even more different toolset.
It's impossible for a single software to cover all possible aspects of biology. The only thing you can do is focus on one group of users and try to fullfill their requirements.
- jfarlow 10y agoyep :) Unfortunately, the dearth of tools means everyone (coming from as many directions) feels like they must rebuild every tool - so there is a bit of a convergence right now - which spreads every tool thin. But the market for 'RNA-seq tools' is but a fraction of 'biochemical scientists', which itself is still a 'tiny' market to produce high-tech software for.