That is exactly what happened pre-TSA. And is isn't so much that local government is better, it is that the whole thing is largely unnecessary to begin with; se

That is exactly what happened pre-TSA. And is isn't so much that local government is better, it is that the whole thing is largely unnecessary to begin with; security was different pre-9/11 and it probably worked about as well as security works now. I don't know how old/young you are, but you probably don't remember a world without passports. They were a temporary measure in response to war; now they are the somewhat Orwellian document without which it is illegal for you to leave the U.S. Imagine making the argument today for rolling back mandatory passports, in a world where few people remember life without them. Sooner than you think, if not already, the TSA will be in that same boat. I would assume you are old enough to have a solid memory of 9/11, but today's younger college students have no memory other than the pre-9/11 world. I was in first grade at the time, and traveled with family a (very) short time after. The airport was guarded by soldiers at the time and I got to witness their guns trained on my father when he couldn't find the key to his luggage. It was quite tense later when my GameBoy Color set off the metal detector. Fun times. History is important, if only so that we can remember that what is today has not always been. (Don't be offended if you already know all this; someone reading this comment will be blown away by the idea of a world without pornoscans, patdowns, and shoe removel). Oh, and for CBP, that is explicitly ("...provide for the common defense...") the exclusive role of the federal government. They should probably keep screening at the border, just ideally with more of a customer service/land of opportunity/"welcome to the USA" vibe rather than the "Muslims/brown people GTFO" vibe.