4 ms·
I tried to get my dad on there and followed a bunch of people for him, at which point it blocked his account until he would verify his phone number because of "
by stevenjohns 10y ago
I tried to get my dad on there and followed a bunch of people for him, at which point it blocked his account until he would verify his phone number because of "suspicious activity."
That was the end of his Twitter journey.
- tracker1 10y agoIn fairness, most new accounts are follow-spammers... of course the bots are probably better at working around the limits in place.
- stevenjohns 10y agoI followed about ~10 people, and about half of those came from Twitter's own follow suggestions. I'd understand if I followed 2500, but it was a nominal and fairly reasonable amount.
- Crespyl 10y agoIf I were interested enough to create a Twitter account, I would start by following a bunch of people I'm interested in, RSS style. I most likely wouldn't post very much, if at all. How many potential new users fit this pattern, are caught by the 'bot' filter, and are shut out of the platform, I wonder?
- Mikushi 10y agoSame experience for a writer friend, convinced him he could get some following on Twitter, created an account got promptly locked and to boot the phone confirmation never came through. Also Twitter sucks, that's why it won't grow, it's mostly bots anyway. (I would know, I wrote tons for it, laughably easy to grow massive accounts under their nose)
- lambdadmitry 10y agoDo you think it's strange to complain about 1) Twitter requiring a phone number during signup 2) Twitter having a lot of bots in the same message? How are they supposed to curb bot registrations if not by checking email/phone combo? I get it that it's trendy to complain about Twitter, but why employing self-contradictions for that?