3 ms·
I'm not sure how to make it more clear: that the state does a dis-service by claiming dominion over the entire electromagnetic spectrum. If one needs to pay to
by jMyles 10y ago
I'm not sure how to make it more clear: that the state does a dis-service by claiming dominion over the entire electromagnetic spectrum.
If one needs to pay to transmit at convenient and reasonable frequencies, at reasonable levels of signal strength, then speech on the spectra in question is simply not free.
I am very much concerned that, outside the visible and audible spectra, along with slivers of 800Mhz, 2.4Ghz, and 5Ghz, that basic free speech is no longer the default.
- JumpCrisscross 10y ago> the state does a dis-service by claiming dominion over the entire electromagnetic spectrum The alternative is the guy with the loudest transmitter wins.
- jMyles 10y agoI don't think that's true, any more than thinking that everybody will be zombifed heroin addicts in the absence of drug prohibition.