3 ms·
>Yes, but the bill is totally ineffective for the average person and only helps the big players. Any regulation that's over a sentence is too much for the lay
by Brockenstein 10y ago
>Yes, but the bill is totally ineffective for the average person and only helps the big players.
Any regulation that's over a sentence is too much for the lay person to bother reading or being aware of.
In the case of the airlines I've seen this a lot were consumers have a lot of opinions how things ought to be. They're oblivious to the consequences of their demands. They don't have a clue what the current regulations are, so can't really have an opinion whether they're good or not. They just assume any time they're mad, regulations must be bad.
- zardo 10y ago>Any regulation that's over a sentence is too much for the lay person to bother reading or being aware of. You don't have to be a direct regulatee to be affected by a regulation. But... as someone that does read a lot of regulations, I generally agree that simpler is better. Or... in the case where we have complex regulations that all the large regulatees are implementing in expert systems anyways. Maybe we should just write executable regulations, we can still have a long list of ambiguous parameters for the lawyers to argue over.