4 ms·
Wow, really, 600$/month for 5GB storage? Even a 8 GB GPU RAM costs less than that for GPU instances. Not trying to undermine the work, but it really does not ha
by CSDude 9y ago
Wow, really, 600$/month for 5GB storage? Even a 8 GB GPU RAM costs less than that for GPU instances. Not trying to undermine the work, but it really does not have that much utility to justify such a huge price for such low capacity.
- GordonS 9y agoYeah, those prices are... wow?! It even says these are introductory prices, which to me at least normally means a 'time limited, cheaper offer'.
- spimmy 9y agoIt's actually a lot cheaper. Honeycomb is a lot more efficient in the way it collects and stores data than any other option available. But yeah, side by side it looks worse. At this stage we are mostly talking to good engineers though, who understand how this works.
- GordonS 9y ago> It's actually a lot cheaper Just so I understand: these prices are a lot cheaper than you plan on making them? > At this stage we are mostly talking to good engineers though, who understand how this works Is that a dig?! For the record, I am more than familiar with how logging works. If Honeycomb is so much better than other offerings, I think you need to do some convincing on your website. Because as it stands, it's not a compelling offering.
- BrandoElFollito 9y ago>... how this works. How what works? Logging or pricing or storage or what?
- misterbowfinger 9y agoCheaper than Splunk: http://splunk.force.com/SplunkCloud?prdType=SplunkCloud http://splunk.force.com/SplunkCloud?prdType=SplunkCloud