3 ms·
Interesting site. One thing I'm confused about, is why PHP? The content is essentially static, of at least infrequently updated. It seems like a waste of pro
by Twirrim 10y ago
Interesting site. One thing I'm confused about, is why PHP? The content is essentially static, of at least infrequently updated. It seems like a waste of processing resources, even with caching, to repeatedly re-process the page in an interpreter. Why not just generate the static content, or even roll it by hand?
- mhotchen 10y agoMaybe he's using a front-end cache like Varnish which is effectively generated static content held in memory.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]