> these types of observations are not routine at all. Perhaps you think I was saying that the EHT project as a whole is uninteresting. I wasn't suggesting thi

> these types of observations are not routine at all. Perhaps you think I was saying that the EHT project as a whole is uninteresting. I wasn't suggesting this at all. I understand that this project calls for a novel type of data collection that requires more coordination, etc. My opinion was that the author's use of certain wordings made things sound more dramatic than they actually were. I imagine that the possibility of bad weather would have been foreseen and planned for (i.e. routine). > it's a little bit click-bait-y, but it's also true that we don't know if there will be an image of the black hole (shadow). This was my point. We still don't know. But, in my opinion, the wording of the title (which is now different than the link text) sort of suggested that we do know.