4 ms·
I believe the X Overflow are the old format, and are now just grandfathered in. All new ones are in the latter style.
by dbaupp 10y ago
I believe the X Overflow are the old format, and are now just grandfathered in. All new ones are in the latter style.
- hackuser 10y agoThanks. What I meant to ask was, given X is the same topic, what is the difference between X overflow and x.stackexchange.com? That is, if there is a general rule. Perhaps the answer is the same: It's just age. But then if X Overflow already existed, why create a redundant x.stackexchange.com?
- dbaupp 10y agoFor the specific case of X = Math, https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/41/differences-between-mathoverflow-and-math-stackexchange https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/41/differences... .
- drewmate 10y agoThat is interesting. I can see the logic there, mostly I'm just impressed that both sites maintain a critical mass of activity, since (at least in recent years) SX seems to require a pretty high level of engagement to get out of perpetual beta. Does anyone know of any other cases with two similar but distinct SX communities?
- allenz 10y agoTaking a look through https://stackexchange.com/sites https://stackexchange.com/sites, I see several fairly specific programming communities: askubuntu.com and unix.stackexchange.com vi.stackexchange.com and emacs.stackexchange.com stackoverflow.com and codereview.stackexchange.com