>Users want drm. False. >they just want their movie. That is the correct statement, Most "users" do not know what DRM so they can not "want it" as you claim

>Users want drm. False. >they just want their movie. That is the correct statement, Most "users" do not know what DRM so they can not "want it" as you claim What they want is for their technology to work. DRM inhibits this. Gaming is an example where users actively are agaist DRM, because in gaming DRM often punishes paying customers BluRay is another example where Paying Legit Customers are punished as BluRay has a way to effectively brick BluRay players via their DRM update methodology Users do not want DRM, they want the content they desire on the Platform/Service they desire. >>So for the html5 to stay relevant, it sadly has to contain it. False Again. Netflix and Google has Achieved what Microsoft Dreamed of in the Browser wars of the 90's Vendor Lockin. No longer is HTML5 a open standard for all, in order to make a HTML5 browser for your platform that plays Video you must now beg Adobe, Microsoft or Google for Permission to use their proprietary bits. W3C has violated their Core mission statement, as such they are no longer relevant at all, they serve no purpose now. We need a New WHATWG, W3C is cancer