3 ms·
Yes, it's the only positive thing about Chrome and HTML5, really.
by Endy 10y ago
Yes, it's the only positive thing about Chrome and HTML5, really.
- Buge 10y agoAnd the ability to play video without being exploited by Flash vulnerabilities is not a positive thing?
- shakna 10y agoIt's not a hell of a lot of change when the DRM blob that gets sent down the wire is just as opaque.
- icebraining 10y agoAt least in Firefox (don't know about Chrome), it's also much more restricted in what it can do.
- caryhartline 10y agoI can only assume you're just posturing because the size and scope of Flash and the size of scope of Flash's security problems are _way_ beyond just a DRM blob.
- shakna 10y ago> size of scope of Flash's security problems are _way_ beyond just a DRM blob. Not sure about that, considering the Widevine's CVEs on Android have been quite bad with privelege escalation and sandbox escaping. A bad video can still be enough to burn your system. That's a full security scope right there.
- shakna 10y agoJust the source, because I hate unsourced claims. [0] http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2015-6639/ http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2015-6639/ - Integrity Impact Complete (There is a total compromise of system integrity. There is a complete loss of system protection, resulting in the entire system being compromised.) It is also worth noting that finding vulnerabilities may be a crime in many jurisdictions [1] (thanks to the DCMA), which would prevent researching coming forward. [1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/03/interoperability-and-w3c-defending-future-present https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/03/interoperability-and-w...
- Silhouette 10y agoBut this problem didn't affect sites using DRM, it just undermined sites that preferred not to. This problem is the reason a lot more sites have rapidly switched to using DRM or other less easily exploitable ways to serve video this year.
- Buge 10y agoYou can at least disable the DRM and still watch videos without it.
- Silhouette 10y agoUndermining websites who were trying not to go the heavyweight DRM route is a positive thing?