> Device seizure without prompt imaging and return of the hardware is bullshit in all but the most grievous cases (e.g. terrorism). I don't think grievousness

> Device seizure without prompt imaging and return of the hardware is bullshit in all but the most grievous cases (e.g. terrorism). I don't think grievousness alone should be enough. Refusal to return the devices should also be predicated on some sort of substantiated belief that returning the devices would lead to some sort of harm. Possibly the case in your terrorism example; clearly not, here.