4 ms·
Why not give employees a % of their amortized stock options per day of employment? Any other scheme is nonsensical and the power balance is clearly on the side
by tabeth 10y ago
Why not give employees a % of their amortized stock options per day of employment? Any other scheme is nonsensical and the power balance is clearly on the side of employers. If you're worried about the employee not adding value then maybe they shouldn't be hired to begin with.
A challenge anyone who doesn't like this to explain why they think it is bad.
- punkdudez 10y agoBecause of the reason why they introduced "cliff". To avoid "job" hoppers that try to gather stock options from multiple startups in the hope, at least one will go IPO or Unicorn basically, without even doing any substantial effort themselves. And propably for various other reasons...
- xref 9y agoThat's an argument for amortization, not against it