9 ms·
This article is from 1998, the landscape was much different. Haskell had a handful of the language features it has today, and was lacking many of the innovation
by jroesch 9y ago
This article is from 1998, the landscape was much different. Haskell had a handful of the language features it has today, and was lacking many of the innovations in its runtime and libraries.
- nv-vn 9y agoVery true. I didn't mean this so much as a criticism of the article, but more of an addition to what the article was already saying. I think all the arguments addressed in it are pretty good, but it's not 100% up to date with the current FP world.