3 ms·
I am not sure if they still teach it, but, when I did CS 15 years ago they told us about computing in the 70's (maybe 60's too ? not sure) when every computer m
by Tistel 10y ago
I am not sure if they still teach it, but, when I did CS 15 years ago they told us about computing in the 70's (maybe 60's too ? not sure) when every computer manufacturer had proprietary languages/OSs/systems on there platform. Once a company had invested years and millions of dollars they basically had you in a trap. They raise the price, you had to pay up. Everyone saw that this was a terrible trap and they started standardizing the languages (hence ANSI/ISO C/C++ etc) that could run on multiple OSs. Woo Hoo, great job guys.
Now what RMS did with open source took this to the next level. Now there is so much control in the hands of the programmers and end users. You can keep stepping into functions until you hit the metal while debugging. Its fantastic and so much better than the previous opaque proprietary libraries of old. Any kid can modify whatever they want. I feel the young people today using npm, pip etc don't really appreciate how different a world we program in thanks to RMS. Had the dev world stayed on the 70's path we would be in a very different place that would have a fraction of the apps we see today.
Now, this lack of history is starting to come back around and bite us. I year and half ago I was on a project that brought on a new manager. He announced that the company was switching everything to Salesforce. He based his decision on the fact that Salesforce throws good parties and he had been invited to one. I looked into it and at the time you had to develop using a language called lightning that was a strange mix of java and sql that, surprise surprise, only ran on their proprietary platform. Because I am now the old guy on every team I spoke my mind and told them this was an obvious trap and once we go down this very expensive road it will be very difficult to get off. The manager guy looked disappointed and said he understood what I was saying. In an effort to get me on board, and missing my point entirely, he got me invited to one of their parties (which had half decent wine and great food and I did not say the phrase "this is an obvious trap" even once, I swear (but I did think it)). Long story short, I quit the job in disgust at their tech choices. (in fairness to SF, I heard near the end that they were switching to javascript, so they may know they need to be more open source)
RMS should be very proud of the fact that no sane programmer in this day and age would ever use anything other than open source. We need to teach tech history to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.
- digi_owl 10y agoAt the same time, people may have lost some of the freedoms they had back in the 60s and 70s to repair and modify their property. Used to be that TVs and such came with full schematics attached inside the case. But as more and more microchips and firmware has gotten involved, those schematics have vanished, as there is little one can do with a multimeter and soldering iron alone. Or look at vehicles. More and more of a car is controlled over the CAN bus. Good luck debugging that. Or look at the struggle between farmers and John Deere.
- tps5 10y ago> no sane programmer in this day and age would ever use anything other than open source. Apparently I'm insane. Well, good to know I guess.
- arnoooooo 10y agoIf you're going to write nice things about Richard Stallman, you should use the name "free software", not "open source" :)
- Gravityloss 10y agoToo bad the business and administration people know very little about this. In good companies at least they then refer to more technical people. Some kind of a "history of software politics" course should be mandatory for business management students. It's very fascinating too, how we ended up here, basically Linux and BSD running the world.