3 ms·
That is because tenancy has a depth of laws surrounding them. The only way to kick a tenant out of his house if with an order from the Court and action by the
by greensoap 9y ago
That is because tenancy has a depth of laws surrounding them. The only way to kick a tenant out of his house if with an order from the Court and action by the sheriff (at least in most states). But your right to stay on the property of another person, outside of tenancy arrangements, do not have that body of law.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- gyc 9y agoYou are absolutely correct that a whole host of laws govern the landlord-tenant relationship. Given how regulated air travel is, as well as United's status as a common carrier, I wouldn't be surprised that there are also similarly restrictive laws for air travel, so I still question whether Dr. Dao did have a duty to vacate his seat despite the breach of contract by United.
- kelnos 9y agoThe actual lawyer who wrote this article believes Dao did have a duty to vacate, so I think that's a bit more authoritative than our layperson opinions here. Of course, only a court could really answer that question, and I'm sure United will try hard to settle this out of court.
- srtjstjsj 9y agoAirplanes also have a depth of laws surrounding them.