4 ms·
So, I'm not allowed to say that your complaint has already been addressed by the very architecture of this site and that ironically you waste your and everybody
by IIIIIIIIIIII 9y ago
So, I'm not allowed to say that your complaint has already been addressed by the very architecture of this site and that ironically you waste your and everybody else's time much more so than what you complain about?
- Jean-Philipe 9y agoMy "complaint" was actually trying to find out why people upvoted in the first place. The "why" is not addressed by this architecture. I'm amazed. People in this thread jump in to defend the upvoting of this post and there's not even one single argument on why it is an interesting article to begin with. > So, I'm not allowed to say that ... Okay, uhm, can you point me out where I didn't allow you anything? Since it is so hard for you to understand. So according to your argumentation, Trump got voted and people should not discuss on why that happened, because the voting system is taking care of the "why" part? You are not making any sense.