4 ms·
> very interesting topic - could you please share a link to the original paper. Unless the link was changed in the few minutes since you posted your comment,
by privong 10y ago
> very interesting topic - could you please share a link to the original paper.
Unless the link was changed in the few minutes since you posted your comment, the link for the article is the original Science paper (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6334/183.full http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6334/183.full)
- pasbesoin 10y ago(From a Javascript-disabled perspective) Page with actual link: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6334/183/tab-pdf http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6334/183/tab-pdf Link to PDF itself: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/356/6334/183.full.pdf http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/356/6334/183.full....
- fpp 10y agosorry mixed it up. If I look at glove & WordNet usage e.g. for topic extraction, bagging / clustering or semantic similarity would you say we would need to get rid of such a bias, e.g. create something like a Geiger counter for NLP. Alternative view - when doing sentiment analysis / classification would you say that such a bias actually helps to identify a type of sentiment in a doc / sentence.
- russdpale 10y agoWouldn't this lead to an entire of idea of contextual bias? Times when it could benefit and be used, and times where it is occluded.