3 ms·
Your original claim was that it was obsolete on arrival and had little to do with innovation. You also claimed that Android had feature equivalency with the new
by houseabsolute 16y ago
Your original claim was that it was obsolete on arrival and had little to do with innovation. You also claimed that Android had feature equivalency with the newly announced iPhone but were selective about the features that are equivalent. Finally, you claimed implicitly that the feature list is what makes the phone, which is obviously untrue. That's why you're getting downvotes.
- crocowhile 16y agoMy claim was that there is nothing innovative in the iPhone 4 compared to the N1 and that technically speaking EVO makes it look obsolete (EVO does 1280×720 @ 25 fps, front camera, hdmi output, supports SD card etc).
- younata 16y agofor the record. 720p is 1280 x 720. As you said, the evo is 25 fps the iphone is at 30 fps, with the same resolution. This is being pedantic, and doesn't really help the argument that the iphone 4 is better, but, at least one of your points is invalid.
- blasdel 16y agoThe EVO and all other Android devices hav stingy minimal built-in storage (originally 256mb, now 512mb since the OS didn't fit anymore). They all have SD card slots, but they need an SD card inserted at all times to not break apps. They've all moved the slots to underneath the battery and given up the pretense of it really being removable storage.