3 ms·
I think the main problem with Digg is the community. There's too much focus on the people and not enough on the content. This creates a sort of "timeocratic" so
by someone_here 16y ago
I think the main problem with Digg is the community. There's too much focus on the people and not enough on the content. This creates a sort of "timeocratic" social platform where the people that can spend the most time on the site control the site. On hacker news and reddit, submissions can rise to the front page solely based on content rather than social position. This allows new users to submit content, creating a more diverse upcoming feed, and more interesting content in the long run.
Adding more social-oriented features will simply amplify the submission problem for new users.
- runevault 16y agoI dunno, being able to pick who's diggs/submissions you follow in a personal stream seems really damned useful to me. That way people I know create great content I can follow their digg stream to see what they're doing without necessarily needing to follow their twitter or the like. If people use it the way it seems meant to be used could be awesome.
- someone_here 16y agoI think the number of people that have useful content to you but are not writing a blog are pretty darn small, and are probably already sending you links through IM or email.
- runevault 16y agoThey might have multiple content streams that I want to aggregate, however. Or multiple substreams (for example, blog categories and I might only care about half of them). Being able to roll all that up into a single feed without bothering with something like yahoo pipes might be handy.
- someone_here 16y agoSo let me get this straight: You're a person who knows someone that doesn't want to start a blog but cares enough about the links/content they want to share that they will log in to Digg.com and categorize them properly. Oh, and you don't want to bother will yahoo pipes. Talk about a niche...
- levesque 16y agoStarting a blog just to re-distribute content doesn't sound like a proper solution to me..
- ojbyrne 16y agoI keep hearing about that, but how is it different from the pages in your profile?
- jokermatt999 16y agoNot sure if you knew this or not, but reddit has had this functionality for ages. Add people to your friends list, and go to /r/friends. Alternately, you can pick up someone's submissions rss feed, and I believe even their likes and dislikes if they opt in to make them public.
- runevault 16y agoBut does reddit let you claim RSS feeds and auto post them as submissions? Supposedly Digg 4 does this.
- jokermatt999 16y agoNo, it doesn't. It's come up in /r/ideasfortheadmins before, but I don't recall hearing any official word from the admins on it.
- mschaecher 16y agoI agree the main problem with Digg is the community as well. The broader Digg community just isn't interested in the kind of content that I am. That doesn't mean they all aren't though. I'm sure there are a lot of people digging quality content from good sources, ie Fast Company and The Nation, but their submissions and Diggs get lost in all the other crap the majority of the community is submitting and digging. The way I see myself using it would be to subscribe to feeds of primarily publishers, like say The Economist, FT, Fast Company, Inc., PopSci, blogs, etc. just like in RSS. But rather than seeing just a straight stream of their updates, the social voting aspect of Digg will help highlight some of the best content coming from these sources. I don't expect to be discovering the latest Suster, Wilson, or Dixon post from the new Digg. HN and Twitter already make sure I see stuff like that, but not the broader realm of publishers who produce content that I would read...but they never get in front of me know.