3 ms·

If you look back at the source for the "Humble People Make the Best Leaders" source, it's a little less straight forward than that. It's not about humble leader

If you look back at the source for the "Humble People Make the Best Leaders" source, it's a little less straight forward than that. It's not about humble leaders, it's mainly a study about how altruistic leaders make their employees feel: https://hbr.org/2014/05/the-best-leaders-are-humble-leaders https://hbr.org/2014/05/the-best-leaders-are-humble-leaders And that supposedly helped in somewhat ambiguous fields: Uniqueness, Belongingess, Team Citizenship, and Innovation

buckbova 10y ago
That's not the only cited reference to back up this claim: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0149206315604187 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0149206315604187 > Findings largely support our theoretical assertions, suggesting that CEO humility has important implications for firm processes and outcomes.
jtraffic 10y ago
Ambiguous indeed. These concepts are so slippery because "humility" in the technical sense used in the research article is not necessarily the same "humility" as used in the vernacular. Nobody usually cares, but in this case I think the technical "humility" is a name given to a murky soup of psychometric attributes.