You are not immune to the anthropocentric fallacy by virtue of being an empiricist, it's a fantasy. We are all anthropocentric by definition, and that is at th

You are not immune to the anthropocentric fallacy by virtue of being an empiricist, it's a fantasy. We are all anthropocentric by definition, and that is at the core of my argument. Note that I don't need for there to be Meaning, I just happen to believe there is because it makes sense to me. It's not particularly anthropocentric because I'm not claiming that it has anything more to do with humans than with space dust. Again this is not about knowledge but about faith. We all have faith in something, but some people have trouble accepting that and instead justify their belief systems by pointing to facts. The problem is we don't live in a mathematical world where the axioms are defined by us, our logic has to ultimately be based on something. I agree with you it's a beautiful thing that we get to choose what that is.