4 ms·
A few hours later: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phantomjs/9aI5d-LDuNE https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phantomjs/9aI5d-LDuN...
by 2T1Qka0rEiPr 10y ago
A few hours later: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phantomjs/9aI5d-LDuNE https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phantomjs/9aI5d-LDuN...
- yamaneko 10y agoAfter his announcement, Vitaly answered to the team: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/phantomjs-dev/S-mEBwuSgKQ/PQdE1A5FAwAJ https://groups.google.com/d/msg/phantomjs-dev/S-mEBwuSgKQ/PQ... > >Is there interest on your side in adopting Chromium as a runtime? There's some existing documentation [2] around the API and embedding, but admittedly, this would be some work. > We are interested. But I am afraid not in the current state. Currently, PhantomJS heavily relies on Qt and QtWebKit. It's not that easy to adopt Chrome as a new runtime. > But I think we could implement PhantomJS as a completely new (with the same API) project that will use Chrome - Phantomium!
- Naracion 10y agoAlso see https://github.com/Vitallium/phantomium https://github.com/Vitallium/phantomium