>But if there are 10 questions to ideally check off before deciding and you only answer 4, that's way too low and dangerous. Unless the time required to answer

>But if there are 10 questions to ideally check off before deciding and you only answer 4, that's way too low and dangerous. Unless the time required to answer those 6 questions is enough time for a competitor to take your place...? Which is the better move? Do you gamble by waiting and hope they guess wrong, thus giving you more information that might help answer your 6 questions? Or do you roll the dice and make the best decision you can given everything you know?