5 ms·
I like the general spirit of automating things, but I find the attitude behind some of this automation a little weird. The point of a lot of these courtesy 'mes
by kinkrtyavimoodh 10y ago
I like the general spirit of automating things, but I find the attitude behind some of this automation a little weird. The point of a lot of these courtesy 'messages' (whether invites, postcards, thank you notes etc.) are that they were personal. The medium does not matter as much as the fact that they were personal, and the money spent on it matters even less, at least to me.
There's no joy in receiving an automated message any more than there is joy in listening to an IVRS voice or an automated sales call. I'd be happier if I received a simple handwritten note or a phone call from a friend inviting me to something than if I was one of 1000 automated recipients of fancy gold-plated card.
For instance, a friend wrote a script to auto reply to people who had wished him on his birthday (he wasn't hiding it, so I didn't have to guess that it was an auto-reply).
Now, the way FB displays and folds posts made on your timeline makes it very difficult and painstaking to reply to a lot of them (if you refresh your page by mistake, you'd have to keep clicking on More... multiple times to get back to where you left). So I'd be completely fine with him posting a common status saying Thank You to everyone.
But knowing that it's a bot reply kinda took away the point of the reply, at least for me.
- paulddraper 10y agoI'm curious to know where it fell on the time matrix :) https://xkcd.com/1205/ https://xkcd.com/1205/
- qq66 10y agoBut is there anything more personal than a computer programmer writing a bot to send messages for him?
- kinkrtyavimoodh 10y agoHaha I'd agree it's more personal than using a random bot downloaded from the net to achieve the same thing :D