3 ms·
> order a passenger removed for disrupting a flight Passenger was not disrupting the flight in any way. Passenger was behaving properly and then was forced to
by devoply 10y ago
> order a passenger removed for disrupting a flight
Passenger was not disrupting the flight in any way. Passenger was behaving properly and then was forced to leave for the convenience of the airlines at great inconvenience to himself, despite the fact that he was as entitled to remain on the flight as any other passenger -- as in this was unfair to him and him alone. It was also made clear to him that he was not responsible for being forced to leave as well as the fact that all the other passengers felt the exact same way as the passenger who was being forced to leave.
- ThrowawayR2 10y agoI think linked article and regulation adequately address that. If the pilot asks an individual to debark, s/he is not, in fact, entitled to remain on the flight, other regulations notwithstanding.
- devoply 10y agoRegardless of your opinions, United is now getting sued by the doctor. So it doesn't seem like reality actually agrees with your sentiments.
- ThrowawayR2 9y agoDoesn't mean a thing. One can initiate a lawsuit for the most frivolous of causes but it doesn't mean that they will win.