4 ms·
Which way was the association, more CPUs -> faster CPU-GPU transfer, or slower? By "physical CPUs" I assume you mean cores in a single socket, but in pre-Haswel
by zbjornson 10y ago
Which way was the association, more CPUs -> faster CPU-GPU transfer, or slower? By "physical CPUs" I assume you mean cores in a single socket, but in pre-Haswell multi-socket systems, the uncore clock speed was tied to the core clock speed, so idle CPUs that enter a low power state can actually cause horrible performance because cache coherence snoop signals have to wait for the low-power/slow CPUs to respond. See https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-moderncode-for-parallel-architectures/topic/379378 https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-moderncode-for...
- KaiserPro 10y agosorry, yes, that was the most important part! single cpu was faster than dual. This was a xeon x56 vs an e5-26 On the z620 the second proc was on a removable daughter board, so it was simple test. on the e5-26 it was most pronounced, the x56 was less obvious