3 ms·
It's also a bad article in the sense that it proposes it as a possible thing. Sure a few of the steps he mentions may be possible, but the assumed conclusion of
by dwighttk 10y ago
It's also a bad article in the sense that it proposes it as a possible thing. Sure a few of the steps he mentions may be possible, but the assumed conclusion of "and then there will no longer be any use case for cameras" is absurd.
- QuantumGravy 10y agoOf course it's not going to work miraculously as the author imagined; there are enough responses here already acknowledging that it's self-evidently absurd for replacing cameras as we know them today. My concern is that few here are imaginative enough to separate that fact from whether or not a future of synthetic photography could happen anyway.